.

Are the IDF gunmen conducting the ongoing extermination of the starving population, aiming their weapons at random targets? Or is some deliberate process of selection for execution taking place? 

The prospect of eliminating Iran in its present geopolitical form through “regime change,” has gradually moved to the centre stage of the Zionist agenda.

The establishment of the Islamic Republic of Iran came about in 1979.

With the approval and backing of a number of high-ranking authorities in the West, including it seems US President Jimmy Carter, the “Islamic Revolution” was set in motion with the touch down in the Iranian capital of a chartered Air France jumbo jet. On Feb. 1 1979, the 747 transported Imam Ruhollah Musavi Khomeini, then a prominent Shia cleric, along with his extended entourage. Coming from Paris, Imam Khomeini arrived in Tehran to a tumultuous welcome from a representative sample of admiring and curious Iranians.

.

.

Ayatollah Khomeini had been vanquished from his country in 1964 by the US-backed puppet regime of the Shah of Iran. The Ayatollah was far from alone among other Shia clerics in his preoccupation with the injustices brought about by imperial authorities who often robbed colonized native peoples of their right to dignity, property and self-determination.

The vanquished Islamic scholar perceived Israel as an especially rapacious imperial polity that draws on the imperial heritage of the British Empire as well as the heavily militarized American superpower.

The other side of this imperial coin coalesced in the Ayatollah’s empathetic understanding concerning the continuing plight of the Palestinians. The contemporary history presently unfolding right before us, presents an open window that is exposing the excruciatingly horrific fate of native Palestinians under the ongoing genocidal derangement of US and Israeli authorities.

Ayatollah Khomeini helped to shape the underlying principles of the Islamic Republic of Iran in ways that placed a high emphasis on the ideal of protecting Palestinian life, land and liberty from Zionist incursions. These incursions took place in order to fulfill the fetish of ethnocentric Jewish supremacy as the highest expression of Israel’s existential purpose.

Image: Ayatollah Khamenei

After Ayatollah Khomeini died in 1989, his successor as Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Khamenei, adopted identical principles with respect to Iran’s sacred duty towards the Palestinians. Ayatollah Khamenei has been much in the news as he took a firm grip on Iran’s governance in the chaotic hours and days after Israel’s surprise invasion.

The central importance of safeguarding the lives and wellbeing of the native Palestinians from Israeli assault goes far to explaining the nature of the Zionist hostility to the Islamic Republic of Iran. The devotion of the people and government of Iran to everything that bears on the survival of the Palestinian people is so transparent and clear, that most Israelis and their Christian Zionist allies lust for the regime change to eliminate Iran as presently constituted.

The Israel-Iran conflict was transformed into a standard fixture frequently referred to in the manufactured discourse of the Global War on Terror (GWOT). The GWOT can be seen as the outgrowth of a purposely specious interpretation of the events of September 11, 2001.

These events have been labelled as 9/11, tellingly the telephone number for emergency calls. The 9/11 emergency measures continue to this day, along with layer upon layer of other emergency measures, to suspend the normal working of laws, government and civil society.

The psychological dimension of the symbolic conflict invoked by the artificially-fabricated Global War on Terror places at the forefront diabolical depictions of Islamic religion, people, governance, and culture. This hostile imagery of Islam is depicted as an integral part of a “clash of civilizations” whose chief theorists present Islam as a discordant global entity headed on a collision course with an idealized image of a harmonious “Judeo-Christian” world.

.

.

Bernard Lewis along with individuals like David Frum, Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, Leo Strauss, William Kristol, Robert Kagan, Ehud Barack, Scooter Libby, Philip Zelikow, Aron Milcham, Michael Chertoff and Alvin K. Hellerstein are prominent among the real culprits of 9/11. All of those named above are Jewish Israel-Firsters with prestigious positions including as political spin doctors that regularly present the 9/11 fictions as if they are facts.

The surviving members of this cabal have played, and continue to play, key roles sustaining the lies and crimes embedded in the hugely transformative 9/11 affair.

The 9/11 deception built on the heritage of Zionist false flags in Palestine and the Middle East together with NATO’s violent episodes undertaken in Operation Gladio to discredit communist political parties across Europe.

.

.

9/11 can be seen in retrospect as a classic deception that should be carefully studied as the most bold and broadly influential false flag event of our times. The term, false flag, came to be a short form for deceptive events. The term has come to represent an expansion of the original meaning of a ship that raised a false flag to misrepresent its country of origin.

Many precedents were set by 9/11 which proved to provide a battering ram in the denigration of core laws, principles, and institutions at the heart of Western Civilization.

For instance two decades after 9/11, the Covidian deceptions were made to seem something like a public health crisis enabled by a well-coordinated set of false flag events. Similarly the “inside job” of Oct. 7, 2023 would probably not have been possible without the trial and error test case provided by Operation 9/11.

The staged event was meant to generate hatred and distrust towards the global religious community of Islam. The events and misinterpretation of 9/11 should be understood first and foremost as a psychological operation.

Many thousands of people would have had to be involved in making Operation 9/11 happen. Most were American goyim charged to take care of tightly circumscribed technical issues that were instrumental in creating the illusion of a jihadist attack by Muslim hijackers acting independently.

Many of those who took care of the details essential to pulling off the ruse of 9/11 were not let into the broader discussion of the overall 9/11 project and its various deceptions, complications and objectives.

Through concerted misrepresentation and misinterpretation, the top tier of like-minded 9/11 culprits were able to exploit the event. The biggest beneficiaries were those on the Israel First side of the Israel-US partnership. The cementing of the elaborate partnership between the Israeli and US elements in the 9/11 operation helped set the stage for the Israel-US partnership whose weird and ornate workings have been on very public display since Oct. 7, 2023.

The interactions linking the Biden government and then the Trump government to the continuous rule of the Netanyahu government keep confounding all previous expectations and patterns inherited from the past. At times it becomes impossible to tell where the Israel government ends and the US government begins.

The bicultural character of Benjamin Netanyahu as genuine expression of the merger of US and Israeli culture provides an important element of the US-Israel partnership in the invasions, in the genocide, and the now in the unfolding of the high-tech war with Iran.

An example of the most recent phases of this merger-in-process has shown up in President Trump’s intervention with law enforcement officials now deep into the process of prosecuting Benjamin Netanyahu for infractions of a number of domestic criminal laws.

This prosecution has taken many unexpected twists, some involving competing interpretations of the role of Netanyahu and his immediate staff in the mysteries of what really happened in the lead up to, and in the duration of, October 7, 2023. Sometimes the events of Oct. 7 are referred to as 10/7 suggesting possible similarities between the “inside jobs” of 2001 and 2023.

Because Netanyahu is desperate to prevent any objective judicial investigation into what really happened on 10/7, the contested issues have worked their way into the domestic criminal proceedings involving the actions of the Israeli Prime Minister and his staff. What did he know on 10/7 and what did he and his staff do or not do based on whatever perceptions they had?

The US President is trying to appoint himself a law giver in the domestic trial of Netanyahu. He has put his own person forward as a sage leader who deserves standing in the ongoing criminal trial of Netanyahu.

Trump has painted a picture of a “witch hunt”against the Israeli PM who he praises as a benevolent saviour of humanity for joining with the US President in preventing Iran from developing nuclear weapons. While the focus of much reporting involves nuclear technology, the core of the real agenda is to eliminate Iran in its present form in the name of “regime change.”

Trump asserted.

.

See this.

Trump is trying hard to closely identify himself and the Office of the US President with Benjamin Netanyahu, a man who many rightfully see as the most notorious genocidaire and war criminal of the twenty-first century. Trump’s designation of himself as some kind of character witness charged to get between the Israeli courts and the Israeli Prime Minister sets many precedents whose fuller implications are obviously troubling and large.

See this.

Trump’s intervention aimed at sabotaging judicial impartiality outside of partisan politics raises many serious issues. These issues highlight the corrosive role of a wide array of US politicians in sabotaging the essential work of the International Criminal Court by placing travel restrictions and other hostile sanctions on ICC staff members including its judges and prosecutors. The ICC is facing harsh political interference to hold it back from proceeding with its criminal prosecutions of Benjamin Netanyahu and Yoav Gallant.

This kind of vocal political interference in the arbitration of jurists in domestic and international courts underlines the collapse of not only public trust and confidence but also the integrity of core procedures for the determination of what is true and what is fictitious; of who is guilty and who is innocent. The treatment of Trump and Netanyahu has established the basis of a test case of who must live within laws and who is placed above the laws. Who is chosen for impunity no matter what crimes they commit?

Back in 2003 the Bush government simply faked the production of evidence to show that the Iraqi government of Saddam Hussein was on the verge of obtaining weapons of mass destruction. This claim was deployed to justify the forthcoming regime change invasion.

While some journalists subsequently took some responsibility for the weapons-of-mass-destruction scam, nothing of the kind ever took place with respect to the many tall tales told to back up the 9/11 fantasy.

In a similar vein Iran is currently being targeted in the course of the US invasion to enact bunker buster bomb attacks on three nuclear installations in Iran. The spin doctors overseeing the Western Media’s interpretation of this story repeated a slightly revised version of the Iraqi myth that Saddam Hussein’s country was just on the verge of getting its own weapons of mass destruction.

An increasingly important element of all the spin doctoring in the story of Iran and nuclear technology concerns to International Atomic Energy Agency founded in 1970. The IAEA’s findings until June of 2025 are that the Iranians have never broken the terms of the Non-Proliferation Treaty in an attempt to develop nuclear weapons. In fact Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei made a fatwa first in 1989 stating Iran would not seek to development nuclear weapons.

In spite of Iran’s restraint, some Iranian officials accuse the IAEA under the leadership of Director General Raphael Grossi of channeling information to Mossad in ways meant to damage Iran. Grossi has also been condemned for not pointing a finger of accusation at the attacks on Iran by the governments of Israel and the United States. These attacks represent a flagrant breach of the UN Charter and of the terms of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

See this.

In his 24 June, 2025 essay entitled, “Israel, Iran: The Confrontation,” Thierry Meyssan confirmed that credible evidence exists to prove Grossi’s connection to his Mossad partners. Meyssan wrote

“despite statements by Benjamin Netanyahu, the first Israeli documents seized by the Iranian Intelligence Ministry called into question the neutrality of Rafael Grossi, director of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), an Argentinian. They revealed that he had transmitted observations from his organization to Israel, even though Israel is not a member.”

The role of Israel in this fiasco is exceedingly problematic because it possesses nuclear weapons outside the structure of international law. Accordingly, in this field as in so many others, Israel is an international pariah and outlaw whose leadership refuses to adhere to the terms of the Non-Proliferation Treaty or seek membership in the IEAE. With all this in mind, the government of Iran decided in recent days to cut off relations with the IAEA.

Let us return back to the core narrative concerning the 9/11 and the set up of Iran for dissolution through so-called regime change. The 9/11 brain trust continues to cover up the real nature of the events of Sept. 11, 2001. Consequently the absurd and ridiculous 9/11 narrative prevails in official circles until this day.

There has been no substantial alteration away from the story whose main elements were set out on the very day of 9/11 without any genuine investigation whatsoever.

Michael Chertoff was one of the key figures in the Justice Department who initially transformed the investigation of the 9/11 evidence into a systematic destruction of evidence. From the first moments after 9/11, Chertoff took charge of the US-Israel coverup, including the hasty elimination of twisted steel beams from area of the obliterated Twin Towers. These beams constituted important evidence of how the enormous structures were destroyed.

See this and this.

It seems the audacious lies about what really happened on 9/11 have been classified on high as being immune to the process of historical revision. In this respect, the 9/11 myth has been declared off bounds to factual challenge and alteration in much the same fashion as the sanctified Holocaust narrative has escaped any genuine reckoning with ongoing research.

New evidence is constantly being discovered prompting some to offer up revised interpretations, a constant process that forms a core preoccupation of professional historians worthy of expert status in a variety of academic fields.

Some members of the 9/11 brain trust made sure that the Islamic Republic of Iran was prominently smeared amidst the orgy of bloody-minded patriotism. This gung ho patriotism was aroused by the hugely transformative psychological operation pulled off by the leading figures of the Israel-US partnership. The main vehicle of the smear was inserted into George W. Bush’s State of the Union Address to the US Congress on Jan, 29 2002.

Bush identified countries that he accused of giving assistance to “terrorists” as the basis of a new “Axis of Evil.” The countries he identified were Iran, Iraq, and North Korea. The sudden flaring up of the undeclared US-Israeli war on Iran can be seen as an effort to deliver the goods promised in 2002 by George Bush when he avoided any reference to evidence as top officials in the Global War on Terror typically do.

To be continued in Part II.

*