
We analyzed nationally representative U.S. government data (NHIS) from 21,990 children in the first-ever study examining childhood COVID vaccination and autism outcomes.
***
We have completed the first population-level study to-date directly examining childhood COVID-19 vaccination in relation to autism and other neurodevelopmental outcomes, using official U.S. government data to compare vaccinated and unvaccinated American children.
Our study is titled, “Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in COVID-19-Vaccinated Versus Unvaccinated U.S. Children: Analysis of the National Health Interview Survey, 2022–2024.” It’s authored by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH (myself); M. Nathaniel Mead, MSc, PhD; Carol Taccetta, MD, FCAP; John A. Catanzaro, NMD, PhD; Robyn A. Honea, PhD; and Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH.
.

.
The data come from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), one of the nation’s principal sources of information on the health of the U.S. civilian population. NHIS is conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), part of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and is designed to produce nationally representative estimates through continuous household interviews.
Using the 2022–2024 NHIS data, we analyzed a nationally representative sample of 21,990 U.S. children. One child per household is randomly selected for the survey, and a parent or guardian provides information on vaccination status, diagnoses, healthcare use, mental health, and other health characteristics.
Compared with COVID-unvaccinated children, COVID-vaccinated children had significantly higher odds of:
- AUTISM: +32%
- ADHD: +33%
- ANY NEURODEVELOPMENTAL DISORDER: +23%
- SPECIAL-ED USE: +19%
- ASTHMA: +24%
- ANXIETY: +27%
- MENTAL-HEALTH DRUG USE: +57%
- MENTAL-HEALTH THERAPY: +60%
These estimates came from models adjusted for age, sex, survey year, race/ethnicity, family income, parental education, insurance, region, wellness visits, and usual source of care.
.

.
The most alarming autism finding emerged among children ages 5–7. In this age group, children who had received 3 or more COVID shots had 154% higher odds of current autism compared with children who had received zero doses.
This age range is especially important because ages 5–7 remain a critical period for brain, language, behavioral, social, and educational development—and also overlap with the period in which many children receive an autism diagnosis.
The manuscript additionally found that among children ages 5–8 who were first vaccinated at age 5 or younger, at least one year before interview, those receiving 3+ doses had 2.46 times the adjusted odds of current autism compared with never-COVID-vaccinated children.
One of the most important findings was the presence of a dose-response pattern. The odds of multiple conditions increased with more COVID shot doses—including autism, ADHD, anxiety, neurodevelopmental disorders, asthma, and mental-health therapy.
.

.
We also examined influenza vaccination as a negative-control exposure. Influenza vaccination was associated with several of the same outcomes, including autism, ADHD, and asthma, which means residual healthcare-engagement confounding cannot be fully ruled out.
However, in direct comparison, children who had received a COVID vaccine but not a recent influenza vaccine had higher odds of autism than children who had received an influenza vaccine but not a COVID vaccine.
The strongest autism estimates were also seen among children who had received both COVID and influenza vaccines, raising the possibility that the observed signal may reflect not only COVID vaccination itself, but cumulative vaccine exposure.
Children who receive vaccines can differ substantially from children who do not. That is why we subjected the autism signal to multiple adjustment and sensitivity analyses.
The association persisted after accounting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, income, parental education, insurance, region, healthcare access, wellness visits, ER use, hospitalization, prescription use, and influenza vaccination.
It also remained after restricting the analysis to physically healthy children without asthma, diabetes, or fair/poor general health.
Most importantly, propensity-score overlap weighting was used to balance vaccinated and unvaccinated children across the measured covariates. This eliminated measured imbalance in factors including age, income, parental education, insurance, and influenza vaccination. The autism association remained:
.

.
At the same time, the negative-control outcomes of emergency-department visits and hospitalization moved toward the null.
The manuscript’s E-value analysis estimated that an unmeasured confounder would need to be associated with both vaccination and autism by a risk ratio of roughly 2.0 to fully explain away the primary autism estimate.
In total, 26 of 27 autism point estimates across the paper’s various specifications exceeded 1, with 13 excluding the null.
Perhaps one of the most troubling aspects of this issue is that pediatric COVID vaccine trials were not designed to answer this question in the first place.
Pediatric authorization relied on immunobridging trials involving only a few thousand children, generally with relatively short follow-up, and none were powered for or systematically collected neurodevelopmental or psychiatric outcomes.
Post-marketing surveillance similarly focused largely on acute outcomes such as myocarditis, anaphylaxis, and seizures rather than long-term neurodevelopmental endpoints.
Yes. Vaccine-derived spike protein has been shown to circulate systemically after vaccination for months to years and has been found in brain vasculature in human studies. Experimental work has found that the S1 subunit can disrupt blood-brain-barrier integrity and trigger inflammatory effects in brain endothelial cells.
Animal work involving prenatal spike-protein exposure has also reported autism-like behavioral changes, neuroinflammation, neuronal changes, altered cytokine signaling, and reduced brain-derived neurotrophic factor.
The developing brain has extraordinarily high metabolic demands during synaptogenesis, circuit formation, cortical development, and activity-dependent pruning. An inflammatory or metabolic insult during those windows could result in alterations to brain development.
This study identifies a population-level signal. It does not, by itself, prove that COVID-19 vaccination causes autism or the other reported outcomes. The largest limitation is that NHIS is cross-sectional and does not provide exact dates of diagnosis. That means the study cannot establish whether vaccination preceded diagnosis in every child.
NHIS does not capture the full childhood vaccination schedule or which routine vaccines may have been given alongside COVID-19 vaccination. Therefore, the observed associations could reflect the COVID-19 vaccine itself, other vaccines received around the same time, or the combined effects of cumulative vaccine exposure.
The next step should be a large linked birth-cohort study beginning before age 3, using complete vaccination records linked to longitudinal medical records and clinically validated neurodevelopmental diagnoses.
Official U.S. government data from 21,990 children revealed a consistent association between childhood COVID-19 vaccination and higher odds of autism, ADHD, anxiety, special-education use, and mental-health treatment.
The autism association persisted across numerous adjustment strategies, strengthened with increasing dose count, and reached its largest estimate in some of the youngest multiply vaccinated children. Among ages 5–7, 3+ COVID shots were associated with 154% higher adjusted odds of current autism.
This is a safety signal that must not be ignored. Endangering the developing brain is a RED LINE. COVID-19 “vaccination” of children should CEASE IMMEDIATELY.
*
Click the share button below to email/forward this article. Follow us on Instagram and X and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost Global Research articles with proper attribution.
Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, Epidemiologist and Foundation Administrator, McCullough Foundation
The Worldwide Corona Crisis, Global Coup d’Etat Against Humanity
by Michel Chossudovsky
Michel Chossudovsky reviews in detail how this insidious project “destroys people’s lives”. He provides a comprehensive analysis of everything you need to know about the “pandemic” — from the medical dimensions to the economic and social repercussions, political underpinnings, and mental and psychological impacts.
“My objective as an author is to inform people worldwide and refute the official narrative which has been used as a justification to destabilize the economic and social fabric of entire countries, followed by the imposition of the “deadly” COVID-19 “vaccine”. This crisis affects humanity in its entirety: almost 8 billion people. We stand in solidarity with our fellow human beings and our children worldwide. Truth is a powerful instrument.”
Reviews
This is an in-depth resource of great interest if it is the wider perspective you are motivated to understand a little better, the author is very knowledgeable about geopolitics and this comes out in the way Covid is contextualized. —Dr. Mike Yeadon
In this war against humanity in which we find ourselves, in this singular, irregular and massive assault against liberty and the goodness of people, Chossudovsky’s book is a rock upon which to sustain our fight. –Dr. Emanuel Garcia
In fifteen concise science-based chapters, Michel traces the false covid pandemic, explaining how a PCR test, producing up to 97% proven false positives, combined with a relentless 24/7 fear campaign, was able to create a worldwide panic-laden “plandemic”; that this plandemic would never have been possible without the infamous DNA-modifying Polymerase Chain Reaction test – which to this day is being pushed on a majority of innocent people who have no clue. His conclusions are evidenced by renown scientists. —Peter Koenig
Professor Chossudovsky exposes the truth that “there is no causal relationship between the virus and economic variables.” In other words, it was not COVID-19 but, rather, the deliberate implementation of the illogical, scientifically baseless lockdowns that caused the shutdown of the global economy. –David Skripac
A reading of Chossudovsky’s book provides a comprehensive lesson in how there is a global coup d’état under way called “The Great Reset” that if not resisted and defeated by freedom loving people everywhere will result in a dystopian future not yet imagined. Pass on this free gift from Professor Chossudovsky before it’s too late. You will not find so much valuable information and analysis in one place. –Edward Curtin
ISBN: 978-0-9879389-3-0, Year: 2022, PDF Ebook, Pages: 164, 15 Chapters
Price: $11.50 FREE COPY! Click here (docsend) and download.
You may also access the online version of the e-Book by clicking here.
Global Research is a reader-funded media. We do not accept any funding from corporations or governments. Help us stay afloat. Click the image below to make a one-time or recurring donation.


3 hour_ago
74


























.jpg)






French (CA)