Language Selection

Retrouvez votre bien-être dans ces temps dure sur Terre , Essayez le MedBed Quantique!
Cliquez ici pour réserver votre séance

Famille et pour toute la Famille avec Le Medbed Quantique® Orgo-Life® une technologie du Canada

Advertising by Adpathway

         

 Advertising by Adpathway

Siblings’ sex traffic lawsuit against Michael Jackson’s estate dismissed over previous ruling

3 week_ago 18

         

NE LAISSER PAS LE 5G DETRUIRE VOTRE ADN Protéger toute votre famille avec les appareils Quantiques Orgo-Life®

  Publicité par Adpathway

A child sex trafficking lawsuit filed against Michael Jackson’s estate has been thrown out of court.

Siblings Edward, Dominic, Marie-Nicole and Aldo Cascio earlier in 2026 lodged a lawsuit against the late King of Pop’s estate, alleging the Thriller hitmaker, who died in 2009 aged 50, “groomed and brainwashed” them when they were minors.

But on Wednesday, Judge Hernán D Vera ruled the matter needs to be handled in confidential arbitration under the clear terms of a 2019 settlement between the quartet and the estate.

Know the news with the 7NEWS app: Download today Arrow

In documents obtained by Billboard, the judge wrote: “Although the allegations are horrific, the court is without discretion to do aught but enforce the language of the arbitration clause.”

The siblings, who grew up with Jackson and once referred to themselves as his “second family”, had previously been staunch supporters of the singer.

But in 2019, following the release of shocking documentary Leaving Neverland, they first made allegations against the late star and reportedly claimed privately at the time they had been “deprogrammed” as a result of the film.

Although there was no admission of wrongdoing, the estate paid them a $A6.7 million settlement, which the Cascios later argued is void and unenforceable because they were coerced into signing the agreement.

But the judge noted their arguments, “while serious”, do not belong in a public courtroom because of the settlement.

He wrote: “While plaintiffs are fully within their rights to raise questions about unconscionability, those challenges must be presented later before an arbitrator.”

The ruling echoed a similar decision made in March by a different judge in California, who oversaw legal proceedings relating to fifth brother Frank Cascio’s sexual assault claims.

In that case, the judge ruled arbitration was required for all future disputes because Frank had signed the same settlement agreement.

The Cascios lawyer branded the latest ruling “disappointing but not surprising”.

read-entire-article

         

        

Une nouvelle Vibration dans le Monde entier avec les Franchise Medbed Quantique®!  

Protéger toute votre famille avec la technologie Orgo-Life®

  Advertising by Adpathway